Utopian Environment of Sustainable Manufacturing in Industry 5.0: A review
Keywords:
Digital Transformation, Industry 5.0, Industrial development, Smart Manufacturing, Sustainable manufacturingAbstract
A key sustainability concept is becoming more challenging than ever, with the increasing population rate, energy poverty, global warming, and surging demand for products and services. Sustainable manufacturing technologies research is growing to support our journey towards sustainable development. This systematic review intends to identify how sustainable manufacturing research is contributing to the development of the Industry 5.0 agenda and for a broader understanding of the links between Industry 5.0 and Sustainable Manufacturing by mapping and summarizing existing research efforts, identifying research agendas, as well as gaps and opportunities for research development. A conceptual framework formed by the principles and technological pillars of Industry 5.0, sustainable manufacturing scope, opportunities previously identified, and sustainability dimensions. Results point to that the current research is aligned with the goals defined by different national industrial programs. There are, however, research gaps and opportunities for field development, becoming more mature and having a significant contribution to fully developing the agenda of Industry 5.0.
Downloads
References
Adel, A. (2022). Future of industry 5.0 in society: human-centric solutions, challenges and prospective research areas. J Cloud Comp, 11, 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-022-00314-5.
Beier, G., Niehoff, S., and Xue, B. (2018). More sustainability in industry through industrial internet of things? Applied Sciences, 8(2), 219. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8020219.
Blümel, E. (2013). Global challenges and innovative technologies geared toward new markets: prospects for virtual and augmented reality. Procedia Computer Science, 25, 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.11.002.
Bogle, I. D. L. (2017). A perspective on smart process manufacturing research challenges for process systems Engineers. Engineering, 3(2), 161–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2017.02.003.
Breque, M., Nul, L. D., and Petridis, A. (2021). Industry 5.0: Towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European industry. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/308407.
Cerri, D. and Terzi, S. (2016). Proposal of a toolset for the improvement of industrial systems’ lifecycle sustainability through the utilization of ict technologies. Computers in Industry, 81, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.09.003.
De Man, J. C. and Strandhagen, J. O. (2017). An industry 4.0 research agenda for sustainable business models. Procedia CIRP, 63, 721–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.315.
Ferrera, E., Rossini, R., Baptista, A., Evans, S., Hovest, G. G., Holgado, M., Lezak, E., Lourenço, E., Masluszczak, Z., Schneider, A., et al. (2017). Toward industry 4.0: efficient and sustainable manufacturing leveraging maestri total efficiency framework. In Sustainable Design and Manufacturing 2017: Selected papers on Sustainable Design and Manufacturing 4, pages 624–633. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319- 57078-5_59.
Ghobakhloo, M. (2020). Determinants of information and digital technology implementation for smart manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 58(8), 2384–2405. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1630775.
Kamble, S., Gunasekaran, A., and Dhone, N. C. (2020). Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing practices for sustainable organisational performance in indian manufacturing companies. International journal of production research, 58(5), 1319–1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1630772.
Kumar, R., Gupta, P., Singh, S., and Jain, D. (2021). Human empowerment by industry 5.0 in digital era: Analysis of enablers. In 2nd International Conference on Future Learning Aspects of Mechanical Engineering (FLAME 2020), pages 401–410. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4320-7_36.
Lee, J. Y., Shin, S., Lee, Y. T., and Libes, D. (2014). Toward development of a testbed for sustainable manufacturing. Concurrent Engineering, Research and Applications, 23(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293x14559527.
Müller, J. M., Kiel, D., and Voigt, K.-I. (2018). What drives the implementation of industry 4.0? the role of opportunities and challenges in the context of sustainability. Sustainability, 10(1), 247. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010247.
Özdemir, V. and Hekim, N. (2018). Birth of industry 5.0: Making sense of big data with artificial intelligence, “the internet of things” and next-generation technology policy. Omics, 22(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2017.0194.
Pramanik, A., Sarkar, S., and Maiti, J. (2021). A real-time video surveillance system for traffic pre-events detection. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 154(5), 106019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106019.
Pramanik, A., Venkatagiri, K., Sarkar, S., and Pal, S. K. (2022). Deep network-based slow feature analysis for human fall detection. In 2022 International Conference on Computational Modelling, Simulation and Optimization (ICCMSO), pages 53–58. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccmso58359.2022.00024 .
Sarkar, S., Lakha, V., Ansari, I., and Maiti, J. (2017). Supplier selection in uncertain environment: A fuzzy MCDM approach. In ICIC2 - 2016, pages 257–266. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2035-3_27.
Sarkar, S., Paramanik, A. R., and Mahanty, B. (2024). A Z-number slacks-based measure dea model-based framework for sustainable supplier selection with imprecise information. Journal of Cleaner Production, 436, 140563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140563 .
Sarkar, S., Pramanik, A., Maiti, J., and Reniers, G. (2020). Predicting and analyzing injury severity: A machine learning-based approach using class-imbalanced proactive and reactive data. Safety science, 125, 104616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104616 .
Sarkar, S., Pratihar, D. K., and Sarkar, B. (2018). An integrated fuzzy multiple criteria supplier selection approach and its application in a welding company. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 46, 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.12.004 .
Sarkar, S., Raj, R., Sammangi, V., Maiti, J., and Pratihar, D. (2019a). An optimization-based decision tree approach for predicting slip-trip-fall accidents at work. Safety Science, 118, 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.009 .
Sarkar, S., Sammangi, V., Raj, R., Maiti, J., and Mitra, P. (2019b). Application of optimized machine learning techniques for prediction of occupational accidents. Computers & Operations Research, 106, 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2018.02.021 .
Sarkar, S., Vinay, S., Djeddi, C., and Maiti, J. (2022). Classification and pattern extraction of incidents: a deep learning-based approach. Neural Computing and Applications, 34, 14253–14274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06780-3.
Sindhwani, R., Afridi, S., Kumar, A., Banaitis, A., Luthra, S., and Singh, P. L. (2022). Can industry 5.0 revolutionize the wave of resilience and social value creation? a multi-criteria framework to analyze enablers. Technology in Society, 68, 101887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101887.
Strandhagen, J. O., Vallandingham, L. R., Fragapane, G., Strandhagen, J. W., Stangeland, A. B. H., and Sharma, N. (2017). Logistics 4.0 and emerging sustainable business models. Advances in Manufacturing, 5(4), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-017-0198-1.
Waibel, M. W., Steenkamp, L. P., Moloko, N., and Oosthuizen, G. (2017). Investigating the effects of smart production systems on sustainability elements. Procedia manufacturing, 8, 731–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.094.
Zhang, Y., Ren, S., Liu, Y., and Si, S. (2017). A big data analytics architecture for cleaner manufacturing and maintenance processes of complex products. Journal of cleaner production, 142, 626–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.123.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Academic Publishing House (IAPH)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
