Experimental Study of Spray Characteristics of Kerosene, Biofuels and Their Blends for Gas Turbine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52756/ijeim.2025.v01.i02.006

Keywords:

Biofuel, Cone angle, Gas turbine, Methanol, Patternation, SVO

Abstract

Conserving limited conventional fuel resources and searching for sustainable energy sources are becoming the necessities of the modern world. Methanol, SVO, biodiesel, kerosene methanol and kerosene biodiesel blends can be some suitable alternatives of kerosene, as a fuel. By using these fuels spray characteristics are done with a pressure swirl atomizer experimentally. This work also describes the preparation of biodiesel from straight vegetable oil (SVO) i.e. sunflower oil. Further sunflower oil biodiesel is blended in 5% and 10% by volume with kerosene. From the present study it has been found that, due to the low viscosity of methanol, the spray cone angle of the methanol blend is larger than kerosene. For the methanol blend more liquid mass is distributed in patternation whereas for kerosene less liquid mass is distributed mainly due to less cone angle. Further, it is seen that the cone angle of biodiesel blends is higher than that of kerosene for a certain flow rate due to the lower viscosity of biodiesel compared to kerosene. However, the cone angle of SVO is much less compared to other cases because of its high viscosity. The viscosity of sunflower oil is more than kerosene and the viscosity of biodiesel is less than kerosene. Therefore, with the increase in viscosity, FN increases from 10% blend, 5% blend, kerosene and then SVO. Thus, the power required for atomization of 10% blend is less than that for 5% blend of kerosene than that of SVO. For biodiesel blends more liquid mass is distributed in patternation whereas for kerosene less liquid mass is distributed mainly due to less cone angle. The above observation can conclude that we can adopt some of the biofuels fully or partially in a gas turbine engine with some modifications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Basak, A., Patra, J., Ganguly, R., & Datta, A. (2013). Effect of transesterification of vegetable oil on liquid flow number and spray cone angle for pressure and twin fluid atomizers. Fuel, 112, 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.05.047.

Braun-Unkhoff, M., Dembowski, J., Herzler, J., Karle, J., Naumann, C., & Riedel, U. (2015). Alternative fuels based on biomass: An experimental and modeling study of ethanol cofiring to natural gas. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 137(9). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029625.

Dafsari, R. A., Lee, H. J., Han, J., Park, D.-C., & Lee, J. (2018). Viscosity effect on the pressure swirl atomization of an alternative aviation fuel. Fuel, 240, 179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.11.132.

Daho, T., Vaitilingom, G., Sanogo, O., Ouiminga, S., Segda, B., Valette, J., Higelin, P., & Koulidiati, J. (2012).Model for predicting evaporation characteristics of vegetable oils droplets based on their fatty acid composition.International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 55(11–12), 2864–2871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.01.048.

Deshmukh, D., Mohan, A. M., Anand, T., & Ravikrishna, R. (2012). Spray characterization of straight vegetable oils at high injection pressures. Fuel, 97, 879–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.01.078.

Giffen, E. & Muraszew, A. (1953). Atomization of Liquid Fuels. Chapman and Hall. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0368393100097832.

Hassan, H. & Khandelwal, B. (2014). Reforming technologies to improve the performance of combustion systems. Aerospace, 1(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace1020067.

Kim, D.-H., Martz, J., Abdul-Nour, A., Yu, X., Jansons, M., & Violi, A. (2017). A six-component surrogate for emulating the physical and chemical characteristics of conventional and alternative jet fuels and their blends. Combustion and Flame, 179, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.01.025.

Lefebvre, A. H. (1985). Fuel effects on gas turbine combustion—ignition, stability, and combustion efficiency. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 107(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3239693.

Lefebvre, A. H. & Ballal, D. R. (2010). Gas Turbine Combustion. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420086058.

Millo, F., Mallamo, F., Vlachos, T., Ciaravino, C., Postrioti, L., & Buitoni, G. (2013). Experimental investigation on the effects on performance and emissions of an automotive euro 5 diesel engine fuelled with b30 from rme and hvo. SAE Technical Papers on CD-ROM/SAE Technical Paper Series. https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-1679.

Panchasara, H. V., Simmons, B. M., Agrawal, A. K., Spear, S. K., & Daly, D. T. (2009). Combustion performance of biodiesel and diesel-vegetable oil blends in a simulated gas turbine burner. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 131(3). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2982137.

Patra, J., Datta, A., Ganguly, R., Sen, S., Chatterjee, S., & Saha, R. (2019). Experimental investigations on spray and combustion characteristics of kerosene oil injected through pressure swirl atomizer. Journal of the International Flame Research Foundation, 13, 2075–3071.

Payri, R., Salvador, F. J., Gimeno, J., & Bracho, G. (2008). Effect of fuel properties on diesel spray development in extreme cold conditions. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D Journal of Automobile Engineering, 222(9), 1743. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544070jauto844.

Prussi, M., Chiaramonti, D., Riccio, G., Martelli, F., & Pari, L. (2011). Straight vegetable oil use in micro-gas turbines: System adaptation and testing. Applied Energy, 89(1), 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.07.031.

Rizk, N. K. & Lefebvre, A. H. (1985). Prediction of velocity coefficient and spray cone angle for simplex swirl atomizers. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems (pp.111C/2/1–16). London.

Serrano, L., Lopes, M., Pires, N., Ribeiro, I., Cascão, P., Tarelho, L. A. C., Monteiro, A., Nielsen, O. J., Silva,M. G. d., & Borrego, C. (2015). Evaluation on effects of using low biodiesel blends in a euro 5 passenger vehicle equipped with a common-rail diesel engine. Applied Energy, 146, 230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.063.

Torres-Jiménez, E., Jerman, M. S., Gregorc, A., Lisec, I., Dorado, M. P., & Kegl, B. (2010). Physical and chemical properties of ethanol–diesel fuel blends. Fuel, 90(2), 795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.09.045.

Welch, M. & Igoe, B. (2015). An introduction to combustion, fuels, emissions, fuel contamination and storage for industrial gas turbines. In Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, volume 56680 (pp. V04AT04A002).: American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2015-42010.

Zhan, C., Feng, Z., Ma, W., Zhang, M., Tang, C., & Huang, Z. (2018). Experimental investigation on effect of ethanol and di-ethyl ether addition on the spray characteristics of diesel/biodiesel blends under high injection pressure. Fuel, 218, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.12.038.

Zheng, J. & Kong, Y. (2009). Spray combustion properties of fast pyrolysis bio-oil produced from rice husk. Energy Conversion and Management, 51(1), 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2009.09.010.

Published

15-04-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Maity, B., & Mondal, S. (2025). Experimental Study of Spray Characteristics of Kerosene, Biofuels and Their Blends for Gas Turbine. International Journal of Engineering and Information Management , 1(2), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.52756/ijeim.2025.v01.i02.006